Dowloading for free

Downloading music, films without paying any money or to buying books less money must be illegal because there is no difference between stealing. Every writer and singer has rights which called literary property or copyright. This rights are protected by goverments. Singers are owners of songs and taking someone’s possession without permission is stealing. By downloding films, music and books from the internet, we escape from paying money, but maybe celebrity needs them. In history there are a lot of examples when very famouse writers died from famine. Why people shouldn’t take result of their work? Singer and writer are jobs as driver or any other one and salary is a budjet picked from selling disks and books. Opponents would say that downloadind MP3, films and to buying books less money must be legal because cds’ costs are too high. But they forget one thing, people can’t afford everything that they want. Do you steal something precious from shops because you can’t afford it? Cost problem is irrelevant to topic, those who thinks that costs are too high must argue with authors to decrease them. In conclusion, it is clearly that downloading for free should be considered illegal.

Do you think it is acceptable to close a website completely because of its content?

Considering personal opinion, experience and knowledge, freedom and democratic society it is unacceptable to close completely website because of its content. Every person has right to decide himself what to do, watch or listen. Everybody has right to have his own taste and opinion and everyone knows what benefits him. According to it closing websites because of its contents is infringement of personal interests and rights. Most countries all over the world emphasize that they are democratic and democracy means that everyone has right to make decisions himself. However, closing websites abridges freedom and restricts liberty. Opponents would urge that some websites contain bad videos and harmful things for kids’ mind. Firstly, every person is able to think and recognize himself what is bad for him and what is not. In addition, we can’t say definitely if website’s content is good or bad. For example, in some European countries www.tagged.com is forbidden by government because some people used it in unmoral ways. It is normal meeting site like a Facebook and a lot of people used it in properly way. What is about kids it is irrelevant to what I am discussing here. It is completely different problem whether parents should or not give permission their kids to use internet. I think that there are a lot of reasons to accept that prohibiting websites is unacceptable and abusive.

Free downliads.

THESIS STATEMENT: Downloading music, films without paying any money or to buy books less money must be illegal because there is no difference between stealing.

SUPPORTING SENTENCE 1: Every writer and singer has rights which called literary property or copyright.

SUPPORTING SENTENCE 2: Singers are owners of songs and taking someone’s possession without permission is stealing.

OPPOSING SENTENCE 1: To download MP3, films and to buy books less money must be legal because music’s costs are too high.

REFUTATION: Do you steal something precious from shops because you can’t afford it? Cost problem is irrelevant to topic those who think that costs are too high must argue with authors to decrease them.

English language education

Considering the importance of English language education in good universities all around the world must be English. The main reason for my propensity is that English is a world language, which is spoken in all countries all over the world. If you know English you are able to explain all your needs everywhere. Another reason can be seen by every person is that if your education language at the university is English you can easily enroll for grate number of university in the world. In short it is easier to make master degree in world’s best universities. Opponents say that you can learn it in the courses but learning English in courses and as an education language is very different. It is more difficult to learn in the courses because practice is the most important part of learning foreign language. People who learned all subjects in their own language would say that education in another language corrupts their mother language but they are not right. As person who took education in English I can confidently say that there is no such problem because outside that classroom you continue to communicate in your mother language. Furthermore, it is not important in which language you get information your brain apprehend it in your own one. Some people say that they have difficulties in understanding but they don’t think that person is very complex being and that he can get used to. Maybe for first month you will have troubles but after you will get used to and will not have any difficulties. In addition I want to say that if it was wrong the best universities wouldn’t educate their students in English. Taking into account of all factors, we may reach the conclusion that education must be in English.

What type of reading do you enjoy most?

I am a student, I read a lot. Most of the reading that I do every day it is in university textbooks. However, this is not the most enjoyable type of reading for me. What I enjoy most is reading both newspaper as well as magazine. One reason that I enjoy reading newspaper and magazines is that this type of reading helps me escape from the pressure of my studies. There is a lot of pressure in the life of a student, and this pressure can be quite strong. To be a successful student, it can be quite helpful to find a way to relax. My way to relax is to read newspapers and magazines. While I am reading them I fill myself away from pressure of my studies and after I am able to return to my lessons refreshed. Other reason is that it keeps me in touch with the world. This is a type of reading with great importance to me.

Euthanasia

One of the problems of modern world is an euthanasia, practice of mercifully ending a person’s life in order to release the person from an incurable disease, intolerable suffering, or undignified death. Most of the legal system and all religions don’t allow doctors to end others lives and I support it because nobody has a right to end somebody’s live. Furthermore, there are several strong reasons for it to be forbidden.
The most essential reason is that allowing euthanasia will open new field in crime. Some people who will be killed will be accepted to end their lives by their own wish. To another people who have chance to recover mad doctors may say that they are hopeless. Euthanasia will be the easiest way to get inheritance and get rid of unwanted people or relatives. It’s clear that some heartless doctors will take bribes.
Another reason is a moral ethic. Not far ago humanity has prohibited death penalty because it was accepted to be unmoral and inhumane. Everybody accepts that nobody has right to end another person’s life, so if death penalty is forbidden why euthanasia should be allowed? What will be the difference between a doctor and an executioner? How parents will explain their children why one people kill others and don’t get punishment? It’s absolutely wrong to accept euthanasia as usual action.
Those who disagree with this idea would find reasons such family pains and medical expenses. What can worse more that ones people life? Life is priceless and invaluable. People work to gain money to spend them on their selves and people who they love. It is possible to earn money but it is impossible to bring dead person alive.
What about suffers, the biggest pain in the world is loosing the person who you love. Even more, person who accepted euthanasia for person who he loves will have doubt that victim could have recovered for whole his life. This person will have a guilty conscience and will not be able to live a normal life. It is very important to do everything you can do, everything that in your hands, other wise you will lose your conscious after your lover’s death.
Sometimes it is said that here is no chance that patient will recover, but how people can know it? Just yesterday cancer was incurable and today many people believe that they will get over this illness like other people did. Medicine doesn’t stay at the same place, it’s improves every day. Everyday many new pills and ways for cure become known. We can’t be sure that today’s hopeless patients will be hopeless tomorrow too. Furthermore, there were a lot of magic events when ill people suddenly recovered. In USA when one hopeless patient was preparing to be donated for organs’ transplantations, he suddenly stand up and said that he was ok. Doctors couldn’t find reason for this magic recovery, so we can’t say that one or other patient is hopeless and will never get better.
In conclusion, because we can never know when person will day and if he will be hopeless tomorrow there is no place for legal death in our world. Therefore, euthanasia can’t be allowed.

Going to class optional or reqied?

Considering laziness of students, attending classes in the university must be required. Students who attend lessons learn more and more familiar with subjects. All teachers have something to teach since they have a lot of experience. One of the most important issues is that lazy students will not come to lessons at all. It’s very difficult for people to do something that they are not responsible for. Another important point is that some lessons couldn’t be learned outside of the classroom. For example, in since department there are lab lessons, how students can do it at home? It is both impossible and very dangerous. In addition teacher-student communication plays a big role in learning process. Without communication it is impossible to prepare social adapted people. Opponents of this idea claim that students’ attendance must be optional. The put forward this idea because they think that some lessons are boring and students may not like them or student can be in bad mood and won’t want to come to the lesson. They say that everybody must decide himself what he wants and what is better for him, every person knows what benefits him well. They have a point of thinking like that but they forget that university students are young and have different crazy ideas. They want to do everything except study. Students think that they must be free but if they free they will not attend classes at all and in the future they will regret about it. They will not gain good knowledge they will know just that in the books and no more. Furthermore most students can not study without teachers. In future society will not have good, professional and skilled personnel. According to all this arguments it is exactly seen that attendance in university must be obligatory.